Re: New Supplements and 30 Day Embargo
Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 5:59 pm1) You guys do hard work, I can appreciate that now after cracking open the editor and promptly getting lost.
2) Legal issues with GW is an on-going scare so information has to be given very carefully.
I would say in light of the electronic form of codex and how the need to be less specific of GW information I would suggest trying to add for the future a means to allow local user "notes" to be added for any given unit or rule which may quiet a few people not liking some wording and may give a bit more breathing room. The trick will be making it expandable for each new option to be included without breaking anything.
The problem is the implementation may be hard/impossible with the present structure.
I am in the process of finding out bits at a time how things work so I can try to appreciate the changes needed.
Only looking to assist rather than add to the work load!
2) Legal issues with GW is an on-going scare so information has to be given very carefully.
I would say in light of the electronic form of codex and how the need to be less specific of GW information I would suggest trying to add for the future a means to allow local user "notes" to be added for any given unit or rule which may quiet a few people not liking some wording and may give a bit more breathing room. The trick will be making it expandable for each new option to be included without breaking anything.
The problem is the implementation may be hard/impossible with the present structure.
I am in the process of finding out bits at a time how things work so I can try to appreciate the changes needed.
Only looking to assist rather than add to the work load!